Hi,

If we map this question it will be as below

10% reduction in flight @Greentown >>>>> Avoid Delay by constructing Hevelia strip  >>>>>>.Expert rejects

Easy POE

A>>>>Its adding new parameter Highway ( So what? Condition)

B>>>>>>..A second largely undeveloped airstrip … Same additional parameter ( So what ? Condition)

D>>>>>  extra jet fuel required adds significantly to the airline’s costs. Premises doesn’t talk about fuel and airline cost. (Vague)

C>>>>commercial and residential development. How this will help to reduce the congestion? Moreover if you negate this it will not weak the argument.

I believe E is the correct answer>>>> which gives strong reason that constructing Hevelia strip  reduce the delay  because the Greetown is having the connecting flights for another places.

“most flights landing at Greentown have many passengers who then take different flights to reach their final destinations.”

Also if you negate this it will weaken the argument.

Hope it helps.

One line diagram will be below:

Patient Advocate: New treatment decrease  pancreatic cancer >>>>>> Allow Dr to Prescribe

Insurer: C of N is more than twice of C  of Old>>>> Lead to High Premium but marginally better care.>>> Not to be included in insurance plans

Easy POE:

A  D, E,

If you review the option B it supports the Advocate not Insurer. “New treatments should only be included in insurance plans” ..

So the answer is C.

Explanation of Answer C: It supports the insurer as it talks in same line of marginally better care.

Hope it helps.

I believe the answer to my question is irrelevant.

As per my understanding the one line map is below:

” Production of Oil  is not enough to fulfill demand” >>>>>> Country B switch demand to other energy sources ( Gasoline Plus Ethanol) to fulfill demand.

Now when we look the options

Easy POE are A, C and E.

Now in between option B and D.

D would be the correct answer as it talks about the demand and supply. D will support the argument as when you aware that the demand < supply, than only Country B would be able to succeed else not.

where as B talks about only production of ethanol >> production of oil.  Does this bridge the gap between Premises and Conclusion? No.. What if the production of ethanol is high but not more than the required demand?

Also, if you negate the option D, it will break the argument.

Hope this helps…

This is my way to look the answer. I am not sure about others..