Shouldnt the 1st statement be sufficient? Since we can form the list {….-16,-8,-4,-2,2,4,8,16….} & so can definitely say that 12 isn’t in the list


K is a set of numbers such that

i) If x is in K, then -x is in K, and

ii) if each of x and y is in K, then xy is in K.

Is 12 in K?

(1) 2 is in K.

(2) 3 is in K.


Intermediate Asked on August 11, 2017 in Data Sufficiency.
Add Comment
1 Answer(s)
Best answer

Hi Nirvan,

I can understand your logic.

But don’t you think, by your logic, answer should be D(Each alone sufficient).

So, lets see what you have mistaken here,

Statement I says that 2 is in the set K, but it didn’t say only 2 or powers of 2 there.

For example, Its like I m saying student X studying in the class, but does it mean that only that student studying in the class. No right ?

So given that, 2 is there in the set,

so obviously according to the 1st condition, -2 is in the set,

and according to the second condition, -4 is in the set, we can build up on this saying 4 also in the set , it keep goes on.

We cant conclusively say whether 12 will be there in the set or not,

If there is 6 in the set, then we could have 12 using the second condition. It’s like may or may not be.

So nothing conclusive.

So statement I is insufficient.

Similar reasoning for statement II,

Together of course sufficient,

Because we will get a 12 using the I and II condition in the question.

So the answer is C.

Hope this helps.

Expert Answered on August 11, 2017.
Add Comment

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.