Woodsville, not Aquaville, should build wind farms in its city.

Woodsville, not Aquaville, should build wind farms in its city. A wind farm, which generates electricity using arrays of thousands of wind-powered turbines, requires vast expanses of open land. Aquaville and Woodsville have similar terrain, but the population density of Aquaville is significantly higher than that of Woodsville. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A . Aquaville and Woodsville are adjacent to each other and both are located in the windiest area of the country.
B. The total land area of Woodsville is substantially greater than that of Aquaville.
C. Nearly all of Aquaville’s population is concentrated in a small part of the county, while Woodsville’s population is spread evenly throughout the country.
D. Wind farms require more land per unit of electricity generated than does any other type of electricity generation facility.
 E Some of the electricity generated by wind farms in Woodsville would be purchased by users outside the county. Woodsville, not Aquaville, should build wind farms in its city.
My Question .. Why answer cant be B?
Add Comment
2 Answer(s)
Best answer

Hi Pandey,

The previous response was spam. We’ll have that removed from the forum.

The answer cannot be B because B does the opposite and strengthens the argument by saying Woodsville has more open land and therefore it makes sense for Woodsville to go for wind turbines

Hope this helps!

Expert Answered on May 24, 2018.
Add Comment

I believe the answer to my question is irrelevant.

Beginner Answered on May 21, 2018.
Add Comment

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.